We tend to think that we can’t change our circumstances. That is definitely a “no” for most of us. After all, if we can’t change our circumstances, we are stuck with them (i.e. we have to live on our knees). This is a “yes” for a select few for whom it is a matter of choice.
We can change our circumstances by doing something else. If you do something else and the circumstances change, then you are stuck with it. However, sometimes it is possible to change your circumstances by not doing something else, for example by doing something else and changing other people’s circumstances, but it seems to me that this is a good idea.
If you want to do something about the circumstances of your life, you may be able to make a difference. You might decide that it is better to not live on your knees, and to live a certain, more dignified life. This may mean that you don’t have to live with your parents anymore, and you might decide to live in a place where your own circumstances are more comfortable. It’s like a sort of reverse existentialist principle.
The reason I bring this up is because actuarial valuation is something that has become trendy lately. As in, you can make a huge change in your life by going to the doctor, getting an actuary to value your life, and then doing something about it. This is sort of like a “reversal” of the way we value people based on their situation in life. It’s also like the way we value people based on the circumstances of their life.
The way we value people is based on their circumstances. When we value people based on their circumstances, they are less valuable. When we value people based on their situation, they are more valuable. This is why people who are in crisis are less valuable than people who are not in crisis. The latter are valuing themselves based on the way they are, and the former are valuing themselves based on their circumstances. This is a good way to get people to think about what they want.
In life, we’re judged by the circumstances we are in. If we were to think about our situation, we’d probably want to be valuing ourselves based on our circumstances, but we can easily decide to be valuing ourselves based on our situation. The value of circumstances is the value of ourselves.
Actuarial valuation is the idea that we value ourselves in relation to a set of factors, usually in order of importance. They include things like our income, our savings, our health, and our relationship with our spouse. For example, a person who is very healthy and has a healthy savings plan would likely value himself as high as a billionaire. A person who is very sick and has a sick savings plan would likely value himself as a bum.
We have no idea how to measure our health. Any health measure is subjective, subjective, subjective, subjective. What we really measure is our weight. We measure our weight in a way that is more objective than weight itself, and we don’t measure weight ourselves. We measure it as a measure of our health, but it is so subjective, subjective, subjective that we don’t know how objectively healthy we should be.
The actuary is a person who looks at a person’s life and their health and says, “this person is healthy.” The actuary is a person who looks at someone’s life and says, “this person is sick.” The actuary is someone who looks at a person’s life and says, “this person is dead.
It’s as if an actuary is an accountant that takes a person’s life and finds out that they are a healthy person. We don’t really know how much of our health is due to genetics, what our genes might be doing to us, and how much could be due to what we are currently doing. We only know that there is a limit to how much we can affect our health.
